• Tired of the same old junk already proven ineffective? Here you can discuss NEW approaches, with other people who think outside the box.

Ideas Using multiple gambling tables to advantage

Trinsic

New Member
Messages
14
Likes
0
#1
Every gambling table has betting limits to avoid lucky large wins from players. But what if you use a combination of tables.

Does this hold any potential to achieve an advantage?

The obvious application would be if you start using a system on a small limit table, and use a betting progression. And if you reached the top of your progression you move to the larger table limit
 
Messages
39
Likes
0
#3
Every gambling table has betting limits to avoid lucky large wins from players. But what if you use a combination of tables.

Does this hold any potential to achieve an advantage?

The obvious application would be if you start using a system on a small limit table, and use a betting progression. And if you reached the top of your progression you move to the larger table limit
Pit bosses will normally increase the table maximum for a bettor upon request.

Betting systems come in three forms, 1) Defense, 2) Attack, and 3) Hybrid. Betting a defense algorithm (increase bets after losses) to more than eight times the base bet (as from $5 to $40) causes recovery betting to become slow, if not impossible. A defense bettor normally shifts to variable interval loss recovery betting after a loss of from one to three losing bets. A defense bettor should never max out the table maximum bet.

An Attack bettor might rarely reach a table maximum. Norman Leigh formed a roulette team that bet the six even payment chances with an attack Labouchere. When a bet escalated to the table maximum (and won), the next bet was the table minimum. "If you hit a home run, why try to hit the ball an inch higher over the fence?"

Attack systems are comprised of parlays or partial parlays, increasing bet size after winnings. Attack systems break with the first loss and are followed with partial or complete regression toward the base bet. Attack systems tolerant of one loss tend to be the most successful. If you choose not to be tolerant of a single loss, the galloping martingale bet for only three wins and then full regression is your best bet. The galloping bets 1 chip after every loss. The win algorithm is a parlay +1chip. A betting series appears 1chip(win), 3chips(win), 7chips(win), start over, bet 1 chip. Galloping should not be more than the three bet series. Extending it makes the next bet as 15chips. Somewhere in the math, the growth curve of the galloping compared to the probability of a win shows that a gross win over time declines. The galloping loses its punch. The galloping should be bet to two or three wins in a row and never to more than four. The table maximum bet is not a factor for the galloping. An increasing parlay might be where a bet of $250 wins and is parlayed to a bet of $500 on a $500 maximum bet table. Rather than change tables to put a $300 bet to parlay to $600, why not take profit by reducing the next bet to $150-$200?

A hibrid system will rarely have a bet of more than five or six chips. There is no danger of reaching a table maximum. A 1 to 10 spread from table minimum to maximum. If the table has a $500 maximum and your betting unit is $5, your betting spread is $5 to $50. If want to change your base bet to $25, then your betting spread becomes $25 to $250.

Forget betting systems that rely upon "progressions." Long term winnings is like trying to dance between the rain drops.
 
Messages
39
Likes
0
#4
Every gambling table has betting limits to avoid lucky large wins from players. But what if you use a combination of tables.

Does this hold any potential to achieve an advantage?

The obvious application would be if you start using a system on a small limit table, and use a betting progression. And if you reached the top of your progression you move to the larger table limit
Pit bosses will normally increase the table maximum for a bettor upon request.

Betting systems come in three forms, 1) Defense, 2) Attack, and 3) Hybrid. Betting a defense algorithm (increase bets after losses) to more than eight times the base bet (as from $5 to $40) causes recovery betting to become slow, if not impossible. A defense bettor normally shifts to variable interval loss recovery betting after a loss of from one to three losing bets. A defense bettor should never max out the table maximum bet.

An Attack bettor might rarely reach a table maximum. Norman Leigh formed a roulette team that bet the six even payment chances with an attack Labouchere. When a bet escalated to the table maximum (and won), the next bet was the table minimum. "If you hit a home run, why try to hit the ball an inch higher over the fence?"

Attack systems are comprised of parlays or partial parlays, increasing bet size after winnings. Attack systems break with the first loss and are followed with partial or complete regression toward the base bet. Attack systems tolerant of one loss tend to be the most successful. If you choose not to be tolerant of a single loss, the galloping martingale bet for only three wins and then full regression is your best bet. The galloping bets 1 chip after every loss. The win algorithm is a parlay +1chip. A betting series appears 1chip(win), 3chips(win), 7chips(win), start over, bet 1 chip. Galloping should not be more than the three bet series. Extending it makes the next bet as 15chips. Somewhere in the math, the growth curve of the galloping compared to the probability of a win shows that a gross win over time declines. The galloping loses its punch. The galloping should be bet to two or three wins in a row and never to more than four. The table maximum bet is not a factor for the galloping. An increasing parlay might be where a bet of $250 wins and is parlayed to a bet of $500 on a $500 maximum bet table. Rather than change tables to put a $300 bet to parlay to $600, why not take profit by reducing the next bet to $150-$200?

A hibrid system will rarely have a bet of more than five or six chips. There is no danger of reaching a table maximum. A 1 to 10 spread from table minimum to maximum. If the table has a $500 maximum and your betting unit is $5, your betting spread is $5 to $50. If want to change your base bet to $25, then your betting spread becomes $25 to $250.

Forget betting systems that rely upon "progressions." Long term winnings is like trying to dance between the rain drops.
 
Top