• Tired of the same old junk already proven ineffective? Here you can discuss NEW approaches, with other people who think outside the box.

Ideas Is luck measurable?

Larry D. Haight PhD

New Member
Messages
39
Our beliefs and meta-beliefs form our reality, how we perceive the world and us. These beliefs filter and cancel out data in a way that we will not become aware of it. That is true for gambling too. There is too much data for our consciousness to process it. So in reality we gamble according to what we belief about a game. But anyone can learn to how to install the right beliefs in his own mind and get into a mental state which allows to perceive subliminal cues and pattern in order to improve the gambling results.
Our analytic awareness prompts us to believe what we see. Our perception of a betting game is that events are the results of "randomity" in action. Moving to the side of this "materialistic viewpoint," we perceive that what we see is only part of reality. "Reality" is "censored" because our sensory equipment is limited. Analytic awareness deals with limited incoming information in a rational fashion but conclusions, in some instances, are distorted to conform to a limited view of reality. This is analogous to a 4K pocket calculator trying to resolve the shape of Australia. "But anyone can learn to how to install the right beliefs in his own mind and get into a mental state which allows to perceive subliminal cues and pattern in order to improve the gambling results." is subject to debate. I have published several eBooks on Kindle ($2.99) that deal with methods of bypassing analytic logic. I don't know if the methods will work for any particular person. If you email a request to drlarryhaight@yahoo.com, I will try to return (as a large file attachment) (free of charge) a PDF copy of HAIGHT ON THE PLASTIC UNIVERSE. In the book are summaries of applications to Baccarat, Blackjack, Craps and Roulette. The methods discussed are variations of the Art of Dowsing. This offer of a free PDF is specific only to you. Anyone else can order from my author page: amazon.com/author/larryhaight
 

Larry D. Haight PhD

New Member
Messages
39
Nothing is above the laws of physics. Anyone that thinks otherwise is fooling themselves. If findings dont coincide with any current model of physics, then the model is wrong. Unless of course the experiment wasnt conducted correctly.

The term "Paranormal" is meaningless to me. Something is either real or not real.

Im sure youve come accross people who believe things without solid foundation. Im not one of them. There is real foundation. I havent had time to explain more yet but will soon.
People do believe many things without solid foundation. We call this prejudice. Prejudice in many instances is a good thing. How can we possibly acquire a solid foundation for all of our beliefs? If something "sounds reasonable," we go with it. Sometimes that which "sounds unreasonable or improbable" is correct. "Paranormal" refers to that which we normally do not perceive. Our sensory equipment is limited in scope. Case in point: can anyone see the electricity in the air before a lightning bolt sticks them in the head? The electricity was "paranormal." Much spoken of as paranormal is garbage thinking because we do not have the sensory equipment to make judgments.
 

Larry D. Haight PhD

New Member
Messages
39
Yours is a comfortable opinion. From an accounting standpoint, "Luck" is a zero sum statistic. One side is as unlucky as the other is lucky. I would never consider (or write about) a betting system that relied upon "being lucky." It would not have an accounting base. I know of no good method of measurement. Wins and losses are sporadic. There is no good reason to think that "luck" as a variable force exists.

There are too many documented studies of "paranormal" events to discount that some people sometimes exhibit knowledge or abilities that are beyond human kin. I don't think "positive psychology" has any effect on a roulette wheel, dice or a horse. I am qualified to make the statement. I hold a B.S. (psychology) and an M.S. (psychology). I think it may be possible that people develop latent abilities. Your expression: "Just hard work and experience." is a case in point. You describe how to improve an ability. Accounting readily accepts that hypothesis. My PhD (business administration) accepts that hypothesis.

We are still stuck with "It takes one white crow to disprove the hypothesis that all crows are black." I have written the four booklets mentioned above and they are now (I think) available on JVZoo and ClickBank. I would make them available for free but because of affiliate costs, $2.95 is as close to free as I can make them. They describe how to develop "Precall" and recognize is (via dowsing) for specific games. They do not "open the skies and let wonders in." They describe how one can develop and test for themselves. I cannot predict that anyone will be successful but I can predict that unless one considers and idea and tests for themselves, they will never know for sure.

As a side note, I doubt the exercises described would have value to either you or myself. It seems that rational thinking inhibits development of latent abilities (if they exist at all). I have no disagreement with the statements that you raised. Your approach is that which I have followed all of my life. "You and I think, we do not believe" or at least not until someone hits us over the head with a two by four.

I no longer have books on JVZoo or ClickBank. A condition of publication on Kindle is that similar eBooks by the same author may not have the eBooks sold elsewhere. You may view the books at my author page: amazon.com/author/larryhaight
 
Top